Decision summary

CHI/18UG/LSC/2022/0006 — service charge decision

In CHI/18UG/LSC/2022/0006, decided 26 October 2022, the First-tier Tribunal considered 12 disputed service charge items at 4 Sawmill Close, Totnes, Devon and reached a mixed result: 2 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: 4 Sawmill Close, Totnes, Devon
Decision date: 26 October 2022
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: Blenheims Estate and Asset Management (SW) Limited.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Reserve fund contributions (2017-18)£88.67£88.67Allowed in full
Other charges (2017-18)£885.33£885.33Allowed in full
Reserve fund contributions (2018-19)£99.67£99.67Allowed in full
Buildings insurance (2018-19)£248.33£0Disallowed entirelyLandlord could not evidence the cost
Other charges (2018-19)£995£995Allowed in full
Reserve fund contributions (2019-20)£100£100Allowed in full
Other charges (2019-20)£1,043£1,043Allowed in full
Reserve fund contributions (2020-21)£118.33£118.33Allowed in full
Other charges (2020-21)£1,066.67£1,066.67Allowed in full
Reserve fund contributions (2021-22)£133.33£133.33Allowed in full
Other charges (2021-22)£1,008.67£1,008.67Allowed in full
Administration charges£0Disallowed entirelyDemand formally invalid

Section 20C order: granted.

Key passages (verbatim)

“The Tribunal has referred to the relevant clauses in the Lease in the preceding paragraphs and finds that the Applicant is contractually obliged to contribute to both reserve funds.”
On reserve fund contributions
“In summary the Tribunal finds that the service charges listed for each year are payable with the exception of the insurance charge for 2018-19.”
On other charges
“The Tribunal has referred to the relevant clauses in the Lease in the preceding paragraphs and finds that the Applicant is contractually obliged to contribute to both reserve funds.”
On reserve fund contributions
“the charges for insurance and insurance valuation listed in the table above are not payable (pending receipt of the required information).”
On buildings insurance
“In summary the Tribunal finds that the service charges listed for each year are payable with the exception of the insurance charge for 2018-19.”
On other charges
“The Tribunal has referred to the relevant clauses in the Lease in the preceding paragraphs and finds that the Applicant is contractually obliged to contribute to both reserve funds.”
On reserve fund contributions
“The poor drafting of the lease and the paucity of documentation provided by the Respondents has been an issue.”
Of Respondent / Blenheims (managing agent)
“it does note that this delay is evidence of poor practice and that the Landlord would ordinarily be unable to recover underpayments by the tenants until accounts are provided.”
Of Respondent
“The Respondent has not provided any information regarding the insurance premium, policy or cover. It would therefore be appropriate for the Respondent to supply additional information to the Applicant to explain the insurance costs as a matter of urgency.”
Of Respondent
“the Respondent has made itself vulnerable to this application.”
Of Respondent

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.