Decision summary

CHI/24UP/LIS/2022/0028 — service charge decision

In CHI/24UP/LIS/2022/0028, decided 19 December 2022, the First-tier Tribunal considered 7 disputed service charge items at 9a Andover Road, Winchester and reached a mixed result: 3 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: 9a Andover Road, Winchester
Decision date: 19 December 2022
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: GH Property Management Services Limited.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Management fees (2019-2021)£300£300Allowed in full—
Buildings insurance (2020-2021)——Allowed in full—
Other charges (2019-2021)——Allowed in full—
Repairs & maintenance (2019-2021)—£1,302.50ReducedApportionment error
Other charges (2019-2021)—£111.25ReducedApportionment error
Administration charges (2019-2021)£90£50ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Administration charges (2019-2021)£150£150Allowed in full—

Key passages (verbatim)

“His fee including vat for the disputed years was £1200 of which the Respondent is liable to pay £300... I am satisfied that the fee charged being £1000 plus vat for the building as a whole is reasonable.”
On management fees
“I find that an interim charge may be levied under the lease. I am satisfied that the budget can include a claim for the premium for the forthcoming year.”
On buildings insurance
“I am satisfied that a prudent landlord would undertake such assessments as are included within the budget... The amounts budgeted are in the order of £450 in total and I am satisfied that such is a reasonable sum to budget.”
On other charges
“I find Mr Forse is only liable for 25% of the estimated costs being £1,302.50 payable in two tranches as demanded of £651.25.”
On repairs & maintenance
“I determine that Mr Forse is only liable to pay 25% of the intercom system costs [85] and so liable for £111.25.”
On other charges
“A sum of £90 is sought for late payment. In my judgment this is not reasonable and using my expertise I substitute a fee of £50.”
On administration charges
“The impression I gained was that Mr Forse only wanted to be charged amounts he agreed with.”
Of Respondent

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.