Decision summary

LON/00AZ/LSC/2022/0007 — service charge decision

In LON/00AZ/LSC/2022/0007, decided 29 June 2022, the First-tier Tribunal considered 10 disputed service charge items at Flat 3, 25 Mount Pleasant Road, London SE13 6RD and found largely for the landlord: 0 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Flat 3, 25 Mount Pleasant Road, London SE13 6RD
Decision date: 29 June 2022
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: Warwick Estates.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Other charges (2019-20)£508.22£508.22Allowed in full
Other charges (2020-21)£689.54£689.54Allowed in full
Management fees (2019-20)£1,635£1,635Allowed in full
Management fees (2020-21)£1,400£1,400Allowed in full
Administration charges£186£186Allowed in full
Administration charges£95£95Allowed in full
Legal & professional costs£250£250Allowed in full
Legal & professional costs£1,080£1,080Allowed in full
Legal & professional costs£115£115Allowed in full
Legal & professional costs£80£80Allowed in full

Key passages (verbatim)

“Balance of service charge arrears for 2019-20 £508.22”
On other charges
“Arrears of advance service charges for 2020-21 £689.54”
On other charges
“The management fees of £1,635 in 2019-20 and estimated at £1,400 for the year 2020-21 are reasonable for the service actually delivered.”
On management fees
“The management fees of £1,635 in 2019-20 and estimated at £1,400 for the year 2020-21 are reasonable for the service actually delivered.”
On management fees
“Preparation and processing of a referral by Warwick Estates to PDC Law for enforcement of payment of service charge arrears £186”
On administration charges
“Process fee from Warwick for reviewing and reconciling outstanding payments £95”
On administration charges
“the time for letters/emails out was set at an unfeasibly high 4.1 hours. This is reduced by 2 hours, reducing the total to £3,776 (2 hours x £150 + VAT = £360).”
Of Claimants' solicitors (costs claimed)

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.